Let me show you, a person can't distinguish between AI writing and SEO writing.
After that, she started crying about those so-called "AI" writings. (Actually, SEO writing could be written by humans without AI tools.)
It's okay that a person lacks information and knowledge that can not distinguish SEO writings, but the problem is that after she cannot distinguish it, she starts to dehumanize the people who have written those SEO writings.
Although they are just huge clickbaits who looking for money, this YouTuber is unable to see through the emotion of those SEO writers, who are just super urgent for money. But view them as 100% AI bots.
There is an argument that always makes me quite disgusted. Which is, AI art versus human art. But AI art is a part of human art. If you put AI art as the opposite of human art, you are dehumanizing those humans who coded to create AI art. After all, I see this is caused by the extreme narcissism; they believe the person (such as themselves) who dislike/don't create/don't use AI art as more humane and superior. It's actually a part of human art versus another part of newer human art.
I admit the authenticity issue of the illusion of AI writing nonfictions, but where is the authenticity issue with AI drawings and AI music? They are supposed to be fictional, not deceptive.
By the way, I wondered if Freya Holmér didn't know what is SEO writing was until this month started crying, she said she's loved knowledge and learning in the video. SEO writings existed for more than 10 years on the internet.
Is it her emotion with authenticity?
I mean, if YouTube dramas are lack of authenticity, why can't I make some lack of authenticity AI drawings? At least they look better than this one.