I'm aware duo low popularity of articles many of you wont' see this content at all but that would be cool if one or two people reads it anyway.
___________________________________________
And because this is my very first article I like to thank all my followers, If you guys have anything to discuss about, I like to share my time.
___________________________________________
The concept of "original work" is already being fundamentally challenged, AI art is turned into AI copies of other AI creations leading more generated data into more generated works. Also media based, content creators that are using generative AI tools to create ''new'' content are just copy of previous AI contents, just overwhelming IMO...
Using same prompt but unique seed gives identical various of the image, changing LoRA or model will give similar results even we use same prompt and seeds. The overall image quailty might have changed duo parameters user set which calles ''Resolution Strategy''
And I was just wondering.. Should we break this cycle and how we can recognize original AI work, rather than an image that are distinct but still closely tied to the original generation.. If you like to have some statics, approximately 87% of image generations claimed, recycled works sourced from existing content. And for my toughts, civitai doing great job by guiding how to create original prompt, getting this community well together, yet rewards if someone else claims your work, even if that user also claimed someone elses work and so on..
So what you guys think, how this cycle end up on our future image and video generations