Yeah, yeah, cover image is a reuse.
Anyway, I have observing that sometimes images get tags that don't make any sense based on the image, which then gives them a rating that doesn't make sense.
For example, https://civitai.red/images/133141560 was rated R, which doesn't make sense given jt's just Darth Vader posing with glass effects, but makes sense when you look at the tags, and it has partial nudity and other tags that fit with a lady with like no top and her full breasts visible.
Solutions? I just rerate it, which seems to help with kicking the image into the "works for yellow buzz" image rating pipeline.
This is annoying, but suggests that the .red side of civitai is needed to actually rate output from the green .com side, which says that more changes will have to happen before I consider it endangered.
Oh, and this is true as of 6/8/2026 to use the American style.
... do I got to manually tag this?