I just realized something:
the models in their creativity can go far far beyond human understanding and comprehension of forms objects and environments, yet we always will be the 'limiting' factor, the 'AND JOIN in(n)' in the process, in our interpretation of these we create, in our inner 'google translate'. We unable to see things or materials our brain is not able to interpret to something it 'knows' not- I want a new DNA :)
****
update: from Apr 30, 2024
I reached OUT to copilot to get the answer on question following AGI reaches its top point what would happen to human impressions in generative models?
Copilot
When Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) reaches its peak, it will mark a significant milestone in human technological advancement. Here are some potential implications:
Unprecedented Capabilities: AGI would possess the ability to understand, learn, and perform tasks across diverse domains with human-like proficiency. It could revolutionize fields such as medicine, scientific research, automation, and creativity.
Ethical Challenges: AGI would raise ethical questions about its use, control, and impact on society. Ensuring that AGI aligns with human values and doesn’t cause harm would be crucial.
Economic Disruption: AGI could lead to job displacement as it automates tasks currently performed by humans. However, it might also create new job opportunities in AGI development and maintenance.
Human-AI Collaboration: AGI could collaborate with humans, augmenting our abilities and accelerating progress. It might assist in solving complex problems, from climate change to space exploration.
Regarding human impressions in generative models, it’s an intriguing area. As generative models improve, they can produce more realistic content, including text, images, and music. However, these models lack genuine consciousness or understanding. They mimic patterns from training data but don’t truly comprehend context or emotions.
Human impressions of generative content will likely evolve:
Fascination: Initially, people will be fascinated by the creativity and novelty of generative outputs. We’ll appreciate their ability to generate art, stories, and music.
Critique and Skepticism: Over time, we’ll scrutinize generative content more critically. We’ll question its authenticity, biases, and ethical implications.
Integration into Culture: As generative models become commonplace, we’ll incorporate their outputs into our lives—whether in entertainment, design, or communication.
Emotional Disconnect: Despite impressive outputs, generative models lack true emotional depth. We’ll recognize this disconnect and appreciate human creativity even more.
In summary, AGI’s ascent will reshape our world, while generative models will continue to intrigue, challenge, and coexist with human creativity.
-AGI generative capabilities will challenge my own creativity and/or comprehension of reality, of art? how do you feel about this? if all we chase is to be impressed by what we recognize, can we jump over that limit, can we expand this limit artificially without drugs? Can we be trained like models?
