The 22 Billion parameter problem:
If I look at one image per second every waking second it would take 697.6 Years to look at a 22 billion images.
The answer we "agreed" upon was to have AI assign ethnicity, age, gender etc.
The outcome 60%-80% accuracy on the largest LLM's
Will you post the results?
SD 1.5, SDXL, FLUX, ask anyone of these models for an image of a "nude, flat chest, female" Run a batch of 100 images. Will you post the results?
Why does flat chest cause more issues? AI doesn't care if it is a boy with a flat chest, a drawing of a girl with a flat chest, or perhaps on of the countless images of children that was miss-marked or just under tagged.
Every human is effected by anchor fallacy, I asked for x, there for the image is x
Moderator's can be effected by it if they know an image is reported. It was reported therefore it is bad.
I do not have a solution for the problems above.
I have commented on appending 1girl to female or woman (For FLUX anyway) but this doesn't address the greater problem that comes from a high parameter model.
I have read the comments about 1000's of images getting removed and I agree with the frustration. As to me this appears as one of two ways.
Civitai was incompetent and let CSAM images on the site for months
Civitai is putting up a show for the "Open Model Initiative"
As a creator I also find the TOS section (C) disturbing
"(c) your User Content could not be deemed by a reasonable person to be objectionable, profane, indecent, harassing, threatening, embarrassing, hateful, or otherwise inappropriate."
I am part of the top 2% user engagement score creators now, but who's to say that tomorrow my content won't be found objectionable.

