Sign In

Cinematic Slider - Stackable - (ZIT)

4.5k

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

stylecinematicsliderloraholic

Download

1 variant available

SafeTensor

10.26 MB

Verified:

Type

LoRA

Stats

979

4.5K

2.5K

Reviews

Published

May 5, 2026

Base Model

ZImageTurbo

Hash

AutoV2
0980327A33
default creator card background decoration
Silver Tools Badge
Loraholic's Avatar

Loraholic

A slider LoRA that pushes images toward a cinematic look.

Because it's Rank 1, it stacks cleanly with other LoRAs without fighting them for influence.

There's no specific use case where this LoRA dont fit in. It works on portraits, landscapes, sci-fi, fantasy, street scenes, naughty stuff - anything benefits from a little treatment from this LoRA.

Strength guide (Recommended 2.0 to 12.0)

2.0-4.0 - Subtle enhancement. Better light, cleaner details, small improvements across the board. Most viewers won't be able to point at what changed, just that the image looks better.

5.0-7.0 - Noticeable shift. Composition tightens up, depth of field deepens, framing gets more intentional. Starts to feel like a still from a movie rather than a snapshot.

8.0-10.0 - Full old-school cinematic. Heavy color grading, dramatic lighting, strong atmosphere, classic film-era aesthetic. Use when you want the image to look like it was pulled straight off a 35mm reel.

🔧 Tips

- Start at 3-4 and work up, the effect compounds quickly.

- Stacks well with style LoRAs like MIDJOURNEY LoRAs, Melancholy etc. But keep in mind these have "cinematic" effects applied already, so it can be smart to start as low as 2-4 at first.

No trigger word required.


All my work is 100% free. The only thing that really matters to me is people leaving a review, good or bad. I will NEVER remove or block anyone for leaving a bad review, so don't be afraid to give me criticism.

I'm stating this because when a creator blocks someone for leaving a bad review, that person can no longer see any of the creator's models, essentially muting their critics. This is something I'm highly critical of, and I believe it's a fundamental quality problem on this site.