LOFI Reviews
I like this model. Especially how it handles prompts.
Some requests generated not like other models, producing more interesting results. At the same time, it is not that it processes complex queries very well.
I like the nature generated by this model.
DPM++ SDE Karras produces very different results with one seed. Other Samplers also give a different results. A lot of uncertainty seems to be in the model, but good results are found from a large scatter.
Negative keywords are not really needed. You do not get NSFW when not asked for.
I did not like portraits (faces) and illustrations generated by this model much, it handles realistic images with illustration vibes (not really realism) better. Does not understand artist names.
Of all the models that call themselves photorealistic, this model actually comes closest to it. I'd actually say, if you want images that look like real photos, LOFI is without alternative at the moment.
It is not without flaws, however. In general, the variety is rather limited, the faces are often similar and have a "mixed ethnicity" look. Also, the relation between person and background can be a bit off, e.g. when you you go with "in a field of flowers" (like in the v2 description), the human often looks tiny.
Still, I consider LOFI a must have.
