Sign In

Karras vs Karras Exponential (Simple KES)

Loading Images

With this set, we look at simple prompts face portraits to see how they compare (upscaled images) vs each other.

Grids were created using a custom grid tool that I created. It will eventually either land on my github or be published as a tool in a larger project I'm working on sometime in the future.

--

I ran a comparison between the standard Karras scheduler and my custom Simple Karras Exponential Scheduler (Simple KES). The key difference is in the visual feel and texture: Karras produces sharper, more photorealistic results with crisp eye detail, well-defined hair strands, and higher contrast in lighting. It’s great when you want maximum detail and realistic skin texture.

Simple KES, on the other hand, blends a Karras start with an exponential decay, creating a smoother, softer look. The images lean slightly more toward an anime-inspired or semi-stylized feel, with larger, rounder eyes and more youthful, gentle features. Skin and hair appear more blended, with less emphasis on fine detail but a pleasing, diffused aesthetic.

Overall, Karras is ideal for sharp, high-detail outputs, while Simple KES excels if you’re aiming for a softer, more approachable style with subtle painterly qualities. Both have unique strengths, and the choice depends on whether you’re chasing realism or a smoother, stylized vibe.

Comments